However, out of 66 consumer reviews the overall score is 2.5 out of 5. I’m not sure whether this is because people expect no problems with newer cars or don’t complain when things go wrong with older ones. The more negative reviews seem to come from newer models. A guy who owned a 2008 panorama had quite a few mechanical faults, whereas someone with an older version didn’t. Individual reports go from good to bad, with some average scores too. I’m not pointing the finger, but I couldn’t find anything on the WhatCar or Top Gear sites. This is impressive considering not many other car review experts have. They scored the Scudo Panorama a 7.0 out of 10. It’s a nice review with some interesting information. I also liked their spiel on how you change your opinion on cars when you have children. I like the way they call the Scudo Panorama the sensible option. Although, at that time, it only came with one trim level it is said to be quite a good specification. They go into a lot of detail about where it originated from and comment on its dimensions and power abilities. The BuyACar experts reviewed the Scudo Panorama in 2007. If they weren’t considering price I’d add the Mercedes Viano. I approve of them listing the competition, which they state are the VW Caravelle, Renault Espace, (not sure about that one), and the Hyundai i800, (agreed). This is good, right? For a Minibus rather than a car its running costs and C02 figures are reasonable. They didn’t like the difficulty in moving the seats, but did say that folding them forward would give you enough space to get a shed load of stuff from Ikea in. They also love the cargo space available with all passengers in situ. What’s there not to like? Being wholly inconsiderate to my needs they haven’t given a score either.įiat Scudo Combi - Interior Seating View Car EnthusiastĬar Enthusiast drove the L2H1 12Q Family eight seat 2.0 multi jet Scudo in or around 2011. Why is everyone so negative about driving a van? I don’t think it’s such a negative! Why is driving a van so bad? Isn’t everyone just been a tad prejudiced towards vans? Being in a van is cool. They don’t like that it looks like a van either. It doesn’t say when AutoCar reviewed the Scudo Panorama but it does say they tested the 2.0 litre 136 bhp tune model. Lower scores were given across the board with an overall rating of 2.5 out of 5. They wanted to see parking sensors as standard due to the vehicles length, but were sadly disappointed at their non-existence. The pros and cons were pretty much identical to the newer model. The overall scored is 3 out of 5.Īuto Trader also looked at a 2007 variant. That’s good if you have lots of feral children or paying customers! Top marks go to practicality and reliability, with lower marks given to ride, handling and performance. Despite the negativity towards the interior plastics they say they are built to last. They aren’t keen on the driving experience, interior plastics or difficulty encountered when removing seats. They like that it can carry so many people, the higher driving position and space. Auto TraderĪuto Trader reviewed the Scudo-Panorama (2007-2012) in December 2010. Auto Trader, Buyacar, roadtestreports and others have kindly written their opinion on this van like people carrier. It hasn’t been reviewed as much as other more popular vehicles, but there are some good opinions out there. The Fiat Scudo Combi has been reviewed by Experts (5) and Users (66). □ Home 7 Seat 2nd Hand 6 Seat 8 Seat 4WD Large Luxury Compact Estate ☰ Fiat Scudo Combi
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |